Monday, April 25, 2005

Holy crap this is funny...

The Random Vin Diesel Fact Generator:

Samplings:

"The white girl saying "Oh my God, Becky, look at her butt" in Sir-Mix-a-Lot's "Baby Got Back" video is one of Vin Diesel's lesser known roles."

"Vin Diesel is the ultimate paradox in that he does not think and yet he very much is."

"The angels still say that when Vin Diesel invented time, God was so touched that he wrote the Bible as a love letter."

*laughing*

Saturday, April 23, 2005

One Month Later...



Amazing what some warm weather can do. If you'll recall, about a month ago, this scene looked like this.

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

Culture Check Time! (Vol. II)

Previous Culture Check can be found here.

Reading: Nightfall, by Nelson DeMille; Joshua, by Joseph Girzone; The Third Option, by Vince Flynn, Blue Like Jazz, by Donald Miller.

Watching (TV): Alias, Lost, Revelations miniseries, Minnesota Twins baseball!

Watching (Movies): Sahara (surprisingly good), Van Helsing (unfortunately bad), A Beautiful Mind (will be reading book soon), Caddyshack (no explanation needed).

Listening to: Guero, Beck; The Bravery (self-titled); Reset EP, Mutemath.

UPDATE: How in the world did I forget that I just watched Napoleon Dynamite? Gosh!

Narnia movie website is live...

The website for my most anticipated movie of 2005 is live. The website is interactive and fun--lots of stuff to look at, including video.

At first glance, it appears they've treated the theological aspects of the book in appropriate fashion. It looks like they've kept the spirit of the book (the character of Aslan is described much in the way we would describe Jesus), but there's no direct mention of the allegory--or of Lewis, for that matter.

Anyway, enjoy! It takes a while to load, so be patient.

NFL Draft Thoughts...

~it's the most wonderful time of the year...there'll be drafting and trading and reaches and value and the Vikes will eff up!!!! it's the most wonderful time....of the year!!!~

Ah, the NFL draft. First and foremost, a cautionary note. I am convinced that no one, not a single person, not Mel Kiper Jr. or Peter King or any other self-proclaimed expert out there has any idea how this draft will go. While I'm sure that these experts know all there is to know about the teams, the players, and the drafting personnel, I don't think there is any way to predict what will happen this weekend in the NFL. As an example, someone pointed out to me yesterday that three NFL.com experts did a first round mock draft yesterday. The three of them were able to agree on only four of the top 32 picks. Throw in the specter of trades, and it's even more complicated. This is what makes this year's NFL Draft fun--it's going to be speculation and guesswork all day long.

From a Vikings' fan perspective, I have one massive request. Dear Mike Tice, please please please do what you must in order to draft Mike Williams. Short of kicker (which no team will draft in the first round...er, sorry Oakland), the wide receiver position is really the most glaring need for the Vikes. We need to do more to try and replace Moss than Travis Taylor--he and Marcus Robinson are talented, but neither is reliable enough to be counted upon. Mike Williams is big, strong, has great hands, and a perfect possession-type receiver who comes with a great attitude and a desire to win. He projects out like a Jimmy Smith-type of guy. I'll take that. Braylon Edwards is just as talented (if not more), but comes with the dropsies and a me-first attitude that was part of the reason we got rid of Moss in the first place. If the Vikes are honest about developing team chemistry, Mike Williams is the pick over Edwards and it's not even close. So, if it means trading up, do it Mr. Tice. If he falls to #7, the pick is clear and we giggle all the way to the bank. But get this kid.

Sidenote: if we draft Williams, the Moss deal has the following final result--Randy Moss for Mike Williams and linebackers Napoleon Harris and Sam Cowart. In the end, I can live with that.

Barring a trade, the Vikes also have a #18 pick. What we need to do with this pick really depends on what we do with the #7. If we get Williams, I think we look defense with this pick. Most prognosticators have the Vikes looking at a defensive end, such as Erasamus James or David Pollack or Marcus Spears. I think this is possible. I also like the idea of taking Thomas Davis, the safety out of Georgia. If we are serious in having a top-of-the-line pass defense, adding another top-notch safety makes sense. Davis is athletic, a hard-hitter, and is in a perfect position to learn from Darren Sharper how to play safety in the NFL. If he's on the board with the #18, he would be my pick. If the Vikes don't get a receiver with the #7, I think we go receiver here. Most likely, Mark Clayton of Oklahoma will be on the board, and he would be a great selection for value and need here. Speedy, good hands, plays like a Derrick Mason.

In the second round, I want kicker Mike Nugent. I realize it is a reach to draft a kicker so high, but I am sick and tired of the Vikes' poor kicking game. We have lost multiple games over the last couple of years due to poor kicking by Aaron Elling and whatever other putz we put out there, not to mention the fact that we're forced to take up three separate roster spaces for a kickoff specialist, a field goal kicker, and a punter. Nugent is the best kicker out there, and he's worth it, in my opinion.

So, like others, I have no idea what will happen this weekend at the draft. But at least I'm honest about it. No matter what, this should be fun.

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

New Pope!

Bells ringing in St. Peter's Square, white (kind of) smoke coming from the chimney. We have a new Pope. May he be a man who represents the face of Jesus to the world.

UPDATE: The world's new Pope is Pope Benedict XVI, formerly known as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the "right hand man" of Pope John Paul II. This should disappoint those who were hoping for a progressive Pope, one who would "modernize" the Catholic Church on social issues. Nevertheless, Benedict XVI should continue the policies of PJPII, which to my mind is a very good thing.

Monday, April 18, 2005

Love Matters...

So I've been thinking some about love lately. No, not the romantic lovey-dovey kind of love that we all talk about ad nauseum. And no, not the love that I have for Minnesota sports teams either (thus proving how similar love is to insanity). I'm talking about real love--expressed love. Call it beyond-compassionate love, irregardless love--true Christian love. The type of love that is shown to a total stranger, for no reason outside of a called duty and desire to serve others without regard for self. The love shown by a young man who volunteers at a local homeless shelter or soup kitchen. The type of love exhibited by a woman volunteering at an AIDS clinic. The type of love that leads a Catholic nun to set up shop in Calcutta, treating those who are shunned and cast out. The type of love that occurs when we go past compassionate feelings, and turn them into action. The type of love that can change the world, if it is true.

We Christians talk a lot about love. And we should. Loving others should be one of the main tenets of our faith. In the early days, it was clearly so--the book of Acts recalls the early days of the church, which added numbers and thrived, largely in part due to the way they put their love for God into action by loving others--sharing food, caring for widows and others in need, spending time together in joy. Jesus said that loving others is second only to loving God, and that showing people love through our actions is the same as loving him. James picks up on this idea and confirms that our Christian faith should be shown through our actions--without action, faith is useless. The apostle John says tells Christians that we should be known by our love.

How are Christians known now? Is it by our love? Are we known by that type of selfless love of which Jesus and the apostles spoke? Do we love, regardless? Or is our love sadly conditional? Is it based not on a person's inherent worth as a child of God, but on that person's worth as we perceive it? Do we use our love as we would currency, giving it to those who we feel deserve it, but withholding it from others? Is our love a commodity?

I do think that Christians do not love as we should, or as we are commanded to. Of course, it is inappropriate to paint an entire community as one, and there are certainly many exceptions. But on the whole, we have de-emphasized the idea of love. In general, I think Christians do a wonderful job of feeling compassionate for others--"those poor dears"--and we confuse that for actual, genuine love (for some people, depending on our personal view of that person's acts and behavior, we forego even the compassion--"they deserve what they got"). But compassionate love is simply not good enough. James is right--just as faith without works is dead, so is love without loving action. We need to do a better job. We need to get beyond the idea that just because a person appears unworthy of love to us, that somehow that makes them unworthy of our love. We are called to something higher than that. A person's race does not matter, their income level does not matter, their politics does not matter, their beliefs do not matter. The only thing that matters is that they are loved by God, and therefore they must be loved by us. The early church understood this, and largely as a result of this unconditional love, they changed the world.

Sadly, I am just as guilty of this as other Christians. My whole life is marked with occasions where I chose not to love another person--or chose to feel compassion, but not put that love to work. Historically, this is because I am either too lazy or too prideful or too selfish to take the time to love, and in that, I have been dead wrong. Perhaps even sinful. I am learning, and it is hard. I recognize the problem within me, however, and I suppose that is a first step. Just as I need to change my way of thinking and put my love into action, so do many other Christians. We are not known by our love anymore, and that is a tragedy. Not only because it marginalizes our message of Jesus as the way to a true relationship with God, but also because it shows how unlike Jesus we are acting. This needs to change. For my part, I need to change. I must love as Jesus would.

Saturday, April 16, 2005

Episode III: A Lost Hope

Back from the posting dead...

If you have any interest whatsoever in Star Wars or the upcoming final chapter, you should really watch this parody trailer entitled "Episode III: A Lost Hope". It's hilarious, and very well done--the guy actually used green screen technology to create it. You'll need Quicktime or Windows Media Player to view it. Enjoy!

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Sorry...

Sorry for the lack of updates lately--life has intruded. Will be posting again soon.

Tuesday, April 05, 2005

'Lost' Timeline

Someone pointed me to this web page today, which is a very complete compilation of the 'Lost' timeline, a compilation of the 'numbers' in the show, and a survivor count plus their connections with each other. This is fantastic--and reflects a ton of work.

So cool.

I'm a Sucker for the Classics...

Back in eighth grade, I read 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee. Little did I know that there was a better version out there...

(Note: ninjas vs. pirates = totally sweet!!!)

Monday, April 04, 2005

Opening Day in Minnesota!

The start of the baseball season is upon us! I've been more excited in years' past, probably because of the steroid scandal that has clouded the sport. Nevertheless, I can't wait to see how the Twins fare this season--they continue to be the best example in baseball of how to run a small market team.

I'm excited to watch some of the youngsters, especially the M&M boys in Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau. Mauer is an all-world player if he can stay healthy, and Morneau is the Twins' first legitimate 30 homer guy since forever. The Twins have always had a stockpile of outfield prospects--too many, some would argue (the release of Restovich is proof enough of this). This year, it's a breath of fresh air to see the team develop some infield prospects such as Jason Bartlett (SS), Terry Tiffee (3B) and Morneau that have made the jump to the big leagues. Add Mauer to that mix, and the Twins have the nucleus of a great infield for the next few years. All in all, a bit more talent on the offensive side this year, but that may end up being counter-balanced by the experience we lost when Guzman and Koskie went elsewhere.

The key, as always, will be the pitching. Reigning Cy Young winner Johan Santana is a given, and Brad Radke and Carlos Silva proved to be above-average pitchers who ate a ton of innings last year. A lot will hinge on whether Joe Mays is rejuvenated and Kyle Lohse is effective. If so, that could jolt this team from a AL-Central contending team to a World Series-contending team. Whether either can do this is the question. I am not so worried about the bullpen, as it should be solid with Joe Nathan, J.C. Romero, and Juan Rincon leading the way.

It should be an exciting year--if things go the Twins' way, this could be the best team in the new era of their success. Can they win it all? Jayson Stark (ESPN) thinks so. Peter Gammons (ESPN) thinks they could, and even if they don't they *should* because baseball needs it. And seven ESPN commentators predict them to at least make the World Series--all but two say they'll win the AL Central. Let's play ball!

Oh, and just for fun, my preseason AL Central predictions:

1. Twins 92-70
2. Indians 84-78
3. White Sox 81-81
4. Tigers 78-84
5. Royals 65-97

Saturday, April 02, 2005

Pope John Paul II Dies...

The only Pope I have ever known has passed away. As I watch, they are ringing the bells at the Vatican to officially announce his death to the tens of thousands congregated there, praying and now mourning.

I am not a Catholic. But I am a Christian, which means my commonality in belief with Pope John Paul II far outweighs any differences. He was spiritually and religiously conservative, a dogmatic, a political force, and a banner for human rights. He was beloved by millions, but more importantly, he loved in return. Now he is experiencing the mysteries of the invisible, and the eternal.

Well done, good and faithful servant.

What comes next? Here is a primer on the papal transition process.

Friday, April 01, 2005

Nature: Moon Eroding

From Nature.com:

"Pictures captured by an orbiting spacecraft have revealed that the Moon is being heavily eroded. Images of the lunar surface reveal deep cracks and holes that are slowly but surely releasing gas and dust into space.

"This is serious," says Brad Kawalkowizc, an astrogeologist from the Sprodj Atomic Research Centre in Belgium, who has analysed the pictures. "There really is less Moon up there than there used to be." If the process continues, he adds, the Moon could eventually crumble away to nothing.

Researchers are not yet certain what is causing the erosion. Kawalkowizc suggests that bacteria left behind by the Apollo Moon landings of the 1960s and 1970s may be responsible. These earthly bacteria, exposed to intense ultraviolet radiation on the lunar surface, could have acquired mutations that allow them to digest Moon rocks, he suggests."

Ahhhhh! AHHHHHHHHH! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

P.S.--April Fools.

2008: Or, An Intervention for Republicans (UPDATED)

This is post two of a two-part intervention for the two major parties. Previously, I posted my thoughts on actions the Democrats need to take to remain viable. Now, Republicans, it's your turn. Now...I've considered myself a conservative all of my life, so as my pappy used to tell me GOP, this is gonna hurt you a lot more than it's gonna hurt me.

GOP, you are in trouble. I realize that some of you may react with a certain bit of incredulity given the electoral events of only five months ago. No doubt, a big win. The GOP was well within its right to celebrate and do so heartily. But time marches on, and frankly GOP, you've managed to pull off something even more stunning, something I never thought possible--you effed it all up in five short months. Congratulations. *cue applause*

From this vantage point, there are two massive problems that plague you, GOP. The first is Hubris. Ego. Narcissism and presumption. You've become the preening peacock so indulged with the plumage behind him that he doesn't notice the axe whistling down at its neck. You've developed a self-congratulatory attitude that has led to blatant hypocrisy on one end and arrogance on the other. I cannot think of a more appropriate personification of this attitude than right here. Rep. DeLay symbolizes everything that is wrong with the GOP's new attitude--ethics and corruption allegations aside, he is unapologetic and carries around an 'it's-ok-for-me-but-I-will-attack-you-for-the-same-thing' attitude that is both hypocritical and repulsive. And not only have you tolerated him as Majority Leader, GOP--you've aided and abetted.

The Hammer has become the face of GOP ethics and attitude and frankly, it is an ugly one. I've criticized Democrats for making the stunningly unwise decision to allow the Michael Moores, the Al Sharptons, the Al Frankens, the MoveOn.orgs to become the face of their party to America. Short of the President, there are none who symbolize the face of the GOP more than Mr. DeLay. If he does not go, GOP, he will take the party down with it. If the arrogance and hubris does not go, GOP, the party will not need DeLay to accomplish the same.

Some hope is found--in the last few weeks, the Wall Street Journal editorial writers issued a scathing condemnation of Mr. DeLay. For your sake, GOP, you should actively support the removal of DeLay as Majority Leader--but that is only the beginning. GOP, you must realize that the voters have given you dominance over national politics--but nothing is permanent. And while you have been given a mandate to govern, by no means were you given a mandate to do as you please without regard for consequence. There is a growing dissonance between the GOP's promises and the GOP's actions, and voters are noticing. Reality is running into hype.

Your second problem is substantive and fundamental--it is one that has laid somewhat dormant over the past four years, but now is rearing its head with a vengeance. Your second problem is the growing divide between conservatism as it is now practiced and the conservatism of history.

It is really beyond argument that over the past five years, President Bush--along with his GOP allies in Congress--has eradicated the GOP as the party of limited government, both fiscally and socially. It used to be that the GOP stood for lower taxes, less government in people's lives, and less government period. No longer. The Bush years have transformed the GOP into the proponent of a "daddy government." The GOP's message is now that the GOP knows how to run our lives and make our choices moreso than we do. The GOP still stands for lower taxes, but has combined this with the worst of both worlds--low taxes and increased spending. The GOP now stands for big GOP government. The GOP now stands for that big GOP government making choices in the place of families and individuals. Gone are the Reagans, the Buckleys, the Goldwaters. Now, the GOP is headed by the Santorums, the DeLays, and yes--the Bushes.

This quick and sudden change is the result of unwise strategy by you GOPers--rather than use its dominance over national politics to limit itself, you GOPers have chosen to extend yourselves. You have alienated the middle and moderates within your party, and veered rightwards. And this quick and sudden change is a problem, GOP, because you are now emulating everything you hated about classical liberalism over the past 70 years. This is a problem not only because it means you have abandoned your roots, but also because it allows the Democrats to seize this mantle and run with it. The sheer ineptitude of the Democrats to sense this problem is the only thing that saved you from this in 2004, GOP, but you apparently have not learned your lesson. When it comes to our conservative foundations, we have met the enemy, GOP--and he is us.

A turning point for many, GOP, may turn out to be the Terri Schiavo case, where you took action to inject the Congress and federal government in the personal decisions of a family in Florida. The facts of that case are in dispute, and mixed feelings abound amongst persons who grapple with the difficult issues raised by Ms. Schiavo's fate. But it is significant that the reaction against your actions was an immediate and sharp rebuke across the board, GOP. Not just from the Left, but from close to 70 percent of Americans. GOP, you must ask yourself why--and realize that the answer lies in in the growing perception that the GOP wants nothing more than to involve itself in the lives of the public. You played policics with a person, GOP. And not only did you abandon any pretense to the principles of federalism that have been part-and-parcel of the GOP's platform for years, but you did so in a situation where most felt your intervention was repugnant.

I will predict that the Schiavo case will end up being the tip of the iceberg. A prime opportunity is here for Democrats to peel away at the GOP majority, and it starts with your abandonment of limited government. If the Democrats come to their senses and take action to promote their party as the party of limited government, GOP, you are sunk. Libertarians will abandon the GOP like rats off a sinking ship, as will those concerned about the growing budget deficit and national debt, and those concerned about your pappy governance over the lives of individuals. Your majority is not so large as to be impervious, GOP, and the voting bloc you assembled in 2004 is not so dedicated that it should be taken for granted. All it will take is a wise strategy by Democrats, and 2006 and 2008 will be ugly, vicious years for the GOP. The Bush years have been years of plenty--but the future promises famine unless these things change.

In short, like the Democrats, the GOP faces a decision--will the GOP continue to move towards the extremes of the party, comfortable in its perception of a mandate and congratulatory in its rightness? Or will it realize that the path towards success lies in the middle? Will the GOP continue on in its newest incarnation of promoting big government, or will it return to its more libertarian roots? These years are critical for you, GOP--now is the time for hard choices. Humility and wisdom in government, and aherence to principle in governance, is essential to the long-term viability of a party's dominance--right now, this writer sees none of it. You are in trouble, GOP--the conservative crackup is just around the bend. Now is the time to make the change--if not, the results will be disasterous.

UPDATE (4/1/05): It's amazing how this Bull Moose Blog post (published the day after the post above) corresponds with my post above. All I can say is, I think we're right. GOP, beware the Democrats shaking off the cobwebs.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.